Background

The InformationÌýTechnology (IT) Accessibility and Security Review Process applies to purchases and adoptions of all informationÌýtechnology regardless of the cost or funding source. The requirement for accessible and secure IT extends to "free" products or services, and also includes products or services developed on campus. This includes purchases for everything including equipment with a digital interface, softwareÌýor systems that can store, manage, control, manipulate or retrieve information for human interaction, and also videos, web content, and communications products.

AllÌýIT goods or services acquired for use in a CUÌýBoulder program, service, or activity must be reviewed for compliance with CU Accessibility and Security policies. ²ÊÃñ±¦µä requires that accessibility and security compliance provisions be included in all contracts or user agreements. Required contract language provisions should be provided to prospective suppliers before negotiations begin.

Important Information

The depth of the review process will depend on the impact and scope of the product or service. At this time, the ICT review team is reviewing all procurement for services broadly used by the campus, a school, college, or departmental unit to ensure compliance with campus ICT Standards.

  • For high-impact purchases, all steps and forms are required before a purchase is made and purchases may not proceed without a full review by the ICT review team.
  • For low-impact purchases, all steps and forms may not be required before a purchase is made.

Low-impact products must still be accessible and secure. It is the responsibility of campus departments to gather all necessary accessibility information, maintain required documentation, and consult with the ICT review teamÌýregarding exceptions to the standards. The ICT review team will be conducting periodic audits to check this information. The ICT review team will provide guidance to departments so that they can ensure the product or service meets applicable policies and regulations in the future.

Learn more

Procurement Approval

Once the accessibility and security reviews have been completed, the CU Requestor will be notified if the requisition has been approved or denied. The CU Requestor will also be notified if any accessibility or security issues need to be resolved, if more information is needed, or if the contract language has to be negotiated.

If more than one product is available that meets the needs of the department or college, the purchaser should consider the one that best meets CU's accessibility and security standards.

Exceptions

In some cases, an exception may be granted by a Security Risk Acceptance or through the ICT Accessibility Review Board (ICTARB) when secure or accessible products are not yet available. Accessibility exceptions are narrowly tailored, limited in duration, and should describe the method through which equally effective alternative access will be provided.

Requests for accessibility exceptions must be completed through the IT Exception Request form. Exception requests should only be requested after the Initial IT Accessibility andÌýSecurityÌýReview form has been completed.Ìý All exception requests will be reviewed byÌýthe ICTARBÌýas defined in the ICT Accessibility Standards exception review process. Exceptions are discouraged and should be requested only when truly necessary. All exception requests and determinations will be made on a case-by-case basis.

For more information regardingÌýexception requests please contact the IT Security and Accessibility ReviewÌýTeams.

ICT Review Process Benefits

  • Eliminating access barriers and implementing security standards in ICT benefits all users associated with the University. For example, providing captioned videos can help students with differing learning styles or English as a Second Language (ESL) learners, which allows for a more diverse learning community. Providing fully accessible, tagged PDF and digital files help students who want to best utilize mobile and computer-based solutions (e.g., give the ability to annotate, highlight digital content, generate study guides), while keeping the University a leader in accessibility and security.
  • The cost to provide accommodations for students, faculty, staff, or the general public often can be reduced or even eliminated by considering accessibility at the time of purchase.
  • Increasingly, universities across the country are facing legal challenges stemming fromÌýcomplaints about inaccessible websites, instructional materials, and/or products or services. Settlements have resulted in schools undertaking major initiatives, often at high cost and in a shortened timeline, to reach compliance.
  • Ensuring secure features and practices are in place up front reduces the risk of possible malicious data security attacks or accidental data loss. Ìý

Timing of ICT Review Process

Requestors should plan in advance for these reviews to be conducted. Initial determination of whether a requisition is considered high or low impact will be made in 2 business days. Most high-impact reviews will take between 1 to 2 weeks, however, on rare occasions, a review could take up to 8 weeks.

Please Note:Ìý

  • The ITÌýAccessibility and Security reviews are only one part of the entire procurement process. Additional time may be needed by the PSC to complete the requisition.